From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 17 06:20:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA12197 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 17 Feb 1996 06:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from lisa.rur.com (G338.257.InterLink.NET [199.202.234.53]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA12192 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 1996 06:20:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from leo@localhost) by lisa.rur.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA25196; Sat, 17 Feb 1996 09:19:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 09:19:23 -0500 (EST) From: Leo Papandreou To: John Reynolds cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP support? In-Reply-To: <199602162345.AA263074337@muffett> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 16 Feb 1996, John Reynolds wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was just wondering if FreeBSD 2.1 currently supports SMP? Not quite there yet. > If not, is this something that might happen in the > near-to-not-so-near future? > Hope so. Would certainly sway some of the L-word juggernaut this way. (Hint, hint, kernel hackers and sundry C-Gods. Is it not time to mount a concerted effort? Entertain, if you will, the following 3 words uttered in the same breath: NT, Solaris, FreeBSD. Cool.)