From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 11 18:18:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA06792 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA06768 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA07293; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704120117.SAA07293@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: "David Langford" cc: ejs@bfd.com (Eric J. Schwertfeger), steve@visint.co.uk, louie@TransSys.COM, michaelh@cet.co.jp, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 430TX ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Apr 1997 14:35:05 -1000." <199704120035.OAA01374@caliban.dihelix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 18:17:09 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of "David Langford" : > Main point is that I think even motherboard makers could be more helpful > in improving memory usage. I would pay a premium for a high bandwidth > motherboard, but I dont see a point in spending $750 for motherboards that > perform just like the $200 boards... It is call lets charge to the hilt for our hardware mistakes . Oh, Don't forget that 64bit PCI based motherboards have not come out yet so guess what? 8) Cheers, Amancio