From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 25 12:23:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA09944 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA09931 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA16426; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: Brandon Gillespie cc: john@starfire.mn.org, FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: "Progress(tm)" on FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Brandon Gillespie wrote: > Question I have never had answered: you can run BSDI binaries in FreeBSD, > is this native or is it pseudo-emulation, i.e. are you better off getting > FreeBSD-native binaries, or does it really matter? You're always better off with native binaries, but BSDi binaries are the next in line. BSDi and FreeBSD are very similiar on many levels, mainly because they are from the same code base, BSD4.4-Lite. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major