From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  5 21:14:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6781065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marcomuskus@une.net.co)
Received: from une-avas-out02.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.231])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAF68FC1A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (une-avas-out02.une.net.co [127.0.0.1])
	by myhostname.mydomain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830671C0B39;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 16:13:59 -0500 (COT)
Received: from unevm-pmta14.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.119])
	by une-avas-out02.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793AC1C04A8;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 16:13:57 -0500 (COT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by unevm-pmta14.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C885C00AB;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 16:13:55 -0500 (COT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unevm-pmta14.une.net.co
Received: from unevm-pmta14.une.net.co ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (unevm-pmta14.une.net.co [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 3mJ-0YQUKU2h; Sun,  5 Aug 2012 16:13:55 -0500 (COT)
Received: from [172.16.1.2] (unknown [190.251.218.142])
	by unevm-pmta14.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7A2D5C009E;
	Sun,  5 Aug 2012 16:13:54 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:13:54 -0500
From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:14:06 -0000

El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
>> Hi Ashkan,
>>
>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the 
>> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll 
>> go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be 
>> the differentiator.
> true. it is consistently slow.
>
> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.

There is no tale, only a feature set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features

>
>
>>
>> Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed.
>
> it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD.
>

Yes ! That's what actually ZFS do with SSD put the most used elements on it.