From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec 30 15:15:58 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA27676
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 15:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from irbs.irbs.com (jc@irbs.irbs.com [199.182.75.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA27661
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 15:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jc@localhost)
          by irbs.irbs.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id SAA01115; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:15:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Mutt.19961230181522.jc@irbs.irbs.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:15:22 -0500
From: jc@irbs.com (John Capo)
To: adonai@jump.net (Lee Crites)
Cc: black@squid.gage.com (Ben Black), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: de ethernet driver stomps SMC 10/100
References: <9612271830.AA25005@squid.gage.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.961230130733.29805A-100000@serv1.jump.net>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Organization: IRBS Engineering, (954) 792-9551
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961230130733.29805A-100000@serv1.jump.net>; from Lee Crites on Dec 30, 1996 13:28:29 -0600
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Lee Crites (adonai@jump.net):
> On Fri, 27 Dec 1996, Ben Black wrote:
> 
> > the new chipset is the DEC 21140-A instead of the DEC 21140.  though they  
> > are in the same family, the two are not driver compatible.  the SMC cards  
> > with the 21140-A chip is generally labelled SMC EtherPower 10/100 B (the B is  
> > the important part).  i just got 5 new P6 machines with the B series and  
> > they are useless to me.
> 
> Well, I'm kind of in the same boat -- maybe.  I am just no trying to bring
> up my first FreeBSD system.  I have a recently purchased SMC9332 10/100
> card.  Nothing on my box or docu states it is a "B" version.  I've tried

Just last night I got a SMC9332BDT working with -stable.  Basically
I detected that the chip was a 21140A and pointed it at a new
boardsw structure.  I haven't tested it a 100Mbs.  Works fine at
10Mps.

These diff fragments are from a 11/11/96 version of if_de.c.

John Capo

if_de.c:

      TULIP_DC21140_DEC_DE500,		/* Digital DE500-?? 10/100 */
      TULIP_DC21140_SMC_9332,		/* SMC 9332 */
+     TULIP_DC21140A_SMC_9332BDT,		/* SMC 9332BDT  with 21140A */
      TULIP_DC21140_COGENT_EM100,		/* Cogent EM100 100 only */
      TULIP_DC21140_ZNYX_ZX34X,		/* ZNYX ZX342 10/100 */

+ static const tulip_boardsw_t tulip_dc21140A_smc9332bdt_boardsw = {
+     TULIP_DC21140A_SMC_9332BDT,
+     "SMC 9332BDT ",
+     tulip_dc21140_smc9332_media_probe,
+     tulip_dc21140_mii_media_preset,
+     tulip_dc21140_mii_probe,
+ };

  	sc->tulip_boardsw = &tulip_dc21140_smc9332_boardsw;
  	return;
      }
+     if (sc->tulip_chipid == TULIP_DC21140A) {
+ 	sc->tulip_boardsw = &tulip_dc21140A_smc9332bdt_boardsw;
+ 	return;
+     }
      id1 = sc->tulip_rombuf[0x60] | (sc->tulip_rombuf[0x61] << 8);
      id2 = sc->tulip_rombuf[0x62] | (sc->tulip_rombuf[0x63] << 8);