From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 00:47:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862BD16A41B for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from stargate.alaskaparadise.com (114-103-74-65.gci.net [65.74.103.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6A243D45 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by stargate.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 4988E409C; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:31 -0800 (AKDT) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060613000605.85741.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060613000605.85741.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1320437.Nk63r52OmS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200606121647.29868.beech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD is #1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:47:29 -0000 --nextPart1320437.Nk63r52OmS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 June 2006 16:06, Danial Thom wrote: > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:36:24PM -0700, > > > > Danial Thom wrote: > > > Freebsd 4.x no doubt :) > > > > At this point FreeBSD 6.x has had way more > > intensive stress testing > > and QA by the project than 4.x did. It is > > stable. > > > > Kris > > I'm not saying that its not, only that I know a > lot of ISPs and more of them are running 4 than > 6. In fact I know exactly 0 running 6. So > proclaiming that Freebsd is #1 without qualifying > what version they are running doesn't really say > anything. > While trying to introduce FreeBSD into a Micro$oft only house, I've heard t= he=20 following many times: "Never heard of FreeBSD" and "Show me some documentation and stats". Regardless of the actual version, the stats are accurate for those provider= s.=20 They reflect overall uptime and connectivity. This isn't about version, it'= s=20 about FreeBSD gaining a firmer foothold in a Micro$oft / Linux dominant=20 world. Personally, I'll take all the help I can get. 'nuff said, Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1320437.Nk63r52OmS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEjgshp5D0B1NlT4URArtzAJ95jHIIJdUzP8ios3O5Z5xHzbvODACfS7Tk LHzm+QUs47rmi+oeo1422fo= =fVVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1320437.Nk63r52OmS--