From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 13 10:32:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9CC16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:32:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.138.254.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C41943D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reza@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F272E0ED for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:30:43 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73396-03 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:29:28 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mail.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.25]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE032E090 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:26:17 +0700 (WIT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:06:44 +0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: natd and ipfw Thread-Index: AcRojwD5FRbqkeN5QE2qc5UpKhOXGw== From: "Mohammad Reza" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: natd and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:32:52 -0000 Dear Lists. =20 I have one question, can nat daemon work with ipfw stateful configuration with check state and setup keep-state. Enlight me please.. =20 Regards reza