From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 3 0: 7:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DFA37B400 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 00:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.thundernet.cz (mail.thundernet.cz [62.77.87.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34C7143E72 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 00:07:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: (qmail 10564 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2002 07:07:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freepuppy.bellavista.cz) (62.168.44.50) by mail.thundernet.cz with SMTP; 3 Sep 2002 07:07:17 -0000 Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 50835159; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:07:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:07:19 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: John Chang Cc: FreeBSD LIST Subject: Re: XFree86 Message-ID: <20020903070718.GI21595@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: John Chang , FreeBSD LIST References: <20020901151838.U37627-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020902185316.0197ca98@j.imap.itd.umich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020902185316.0197ca98@j.imap.itd.umich.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG # John Chang / 2002-09-02 18:55:12 +0000 (-0400): > Is it bad practice (security-wise and performance) to run a GUI like > Xfree86 when doing some administration? if we're talking about servers... that is a matter of taste, but, umm, yes. > Or should everything be done in command-line and not install it? what kind of administration do you need X for? -- FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE 9:04AM up 13 days, 14:56, 9 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message