From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 9 20:33:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA03757 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 20:33:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA03729 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 20:33:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA171789974; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 23:32:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 23:32:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports submissions via /pub/FreeBSD/incoming In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 9 Aug 1998, Steve Price wrote: > I don't want to create a big fuss, but does anybody > besides me find that having portballs sent to the > incoming directory on ftp.freebsd.org is a bit of a > pain? I have a much easier time closing PRs when > they are attached to the PR. I know this fattens > up the PR system but it does make good at keeping > records of the original portball. Agreed. This also makes submitting the port a one-stop shop, if you will. The person reviewing the port has to take the extra step as well. It's ugly. - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message