From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 19 16:53:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from blockhead.mincom.com (blockhead1.mincom.com [203.55.175.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495C18198 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:52:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from philh@mincom.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by blockhead.mincom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA49009; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:52:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from philh@mincom.com) Received: from porthole.mincom.oz.au(172.17.100.2) via SMTP by blockhead.mincom.oz.au, id smtpdG49005; Wed Oct 20 09:52:46 1999 Received: (from philh@localhost) by porthole.mincom.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) id JAA07051; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:52:45 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:52:45 +1000 From: Phil Homewood To: Tony Finch Cc: "Ronald F. Guilmette" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stupid file system tricks. Message-ID: <19991020095245.P8842@mincom.com> References: <64003B21ECCAD11185C500805F31EC0303E73E0E@houston.matchlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Tony Finch on Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 03:45:57PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tony Finch wrote: > nullfs would be great for this situation if it worked. Or NFS, if nullfs is still broke. mount localhost:/some/mounted/dir /some/other/location Obviously a nullfs is (theoretically) more efficient, but NFS has been working for me for years. -- Phil Homewood DNRC email: philh@mincom.com Postmaster and BOFH Mincom Ltd phone: +61-7-3303-3524 Brisbane, QLD Australia fax: +61-7-3303-3269 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message