From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 11:35:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAE716A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B1143D60 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j58BZTBf035194; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:05:30 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:05:10 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050608122324.C41471@p-i-n.com> In-Reply-To: <20050608122324.C41471@p-i-n.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506082105.24359.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 () IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Cc: "Raphael H. Becker" Subject: Re: Accessing SCSI-Devices >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:35:42 -0000 --nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:53, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > The RAID was preconfigured with two 50% partitions which were assigned > to two LUNs. FreeBSD 5.4 was able to detect those as da1 and da2 with > full capacity. > > For particular reasons I need one filesystem. > > The support for this RAID told me just SuSE Linux and W2k3/64Bit Systems > are able to access devices >2TB (64bit LBA) therefore the larger RAIDs > are preconfigured with smaller partitions. This sentance doesn't make sense.. They ARE able to access >2Tb so the RAID is _split_.. Why would you do that? If they can access 2Tb disks then surely you'd just present it as one drive= =20 and be done with it. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCptf85ZPcIHs/zowRAtoHAJwPO6pe4Rhrq7wctF9GowXmJy+WnQCePmFs iL3hDP2PzCTkCtOHT+tPAg0= =L2Vh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart55912633.fYYoQ5YYtT--