From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 21:32:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E94A1065670; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite.broker.freenet6.net [IPv6:2001:5c0:1000:b::599b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659E78FC12; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (phenom.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7GLWOvJ020879; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:32:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) X-Authentication-Warning: otrada.od.ua: Host phenom.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10] claimed to be [10.0.0.10] Message-ID: <4C69AE22.2030201@ukr.net> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:31:14 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Performance AMD Phenom II X6 1090T X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:32:31 -0000 Is there anyone using AMD Phenom II X6 1090T? What can you say about it's performance? Have you any tasks that use all 6-cores? Does it balance workload between all 6 cores properly? I am interested how it will work specifically under 8.1-RELEASE and 9.0-CURRENT.