From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 23 12:33:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gccomm.net (unix1.gccomm.net [207.8.140.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992231521E for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:33:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from admin@gccomm.net) Received: from tvmaster (tvmaster2.whyy.org [207.245.66.49]) by gccomm.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04172 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:31:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005501be8dbf$ee0aaea0$3142f5cf@whyy.org> From: "Jeff Ehrenkrantz" To: Subject: Domain Aliasing Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:31:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi All, I have been going in circles for a while on this one I currently have a box on the net xxx.8.140.95 netmask 0xffffff00 using a border router of xxx.8.140.1 the router is not under my control. i have been asked to renumber to xxx.8.237.221 soo i retarted with an alias entry on the new interface in rc.conf netmask of 0xffffffff i dns servers on the system so willhave to use both interfaces untill the dns stuff gets squared away. i can ping to the ...221 alias ok but the outside world doesn't see it. the upstream provider says i should be able to. as is often the case the box is 2 hours away and remotly admin'd. do i need to change the netmask of the .95 interface to include the .221 during the transition? I'm running 3.1-RELEASE any help would be appreciated. ..je To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message