From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 18:38:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795891065675 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309028FC26 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e11so976950rng.7 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:38:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=o54b1rpM1/9tdGnEK1Jqqx1qTee4HEj+2VeVby5AMrI=; b=FqXcum2zgBo98k8HDLwSdhbqEzsSP2eygN6TQKgICQ4uClhdLi70pYeEICyYk+u0xmKErKt4h88a5dM3vGb21NrqORj6ESJCHjlI/AJvbfHGxKE32Y5q4HOtZ6qo8wlP09/qwpSub/kipcUyGQZhm2lJxAfX+CN3Bq/ICpcHJU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=vOoV1oS9PKjK1yGYksKAUz+YsB0SbYYz7fgq4bFJ6Ugh7E1g96v04eyhPL3QDHRGSU2JYsMfvF/joesZo3TF1ixlzNYMl9iT8iqoQ90eT3zcQrxYqB8Moslq77yHmBN2/pid6GXC8/CnGT9f31vdm9nSv0X4H7is0hSYoZWZHPA= Received: by 10.142.89.9 with SMTP id m9mr945515wfb.116.1204915096283; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:38:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.177.4 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:38:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0803071038t64e579e3uddee8aaa2ec6bb1a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:38:16 -0800 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Mark Atkinson" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unable to recieve on em 82542 w/o promisc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:38:18 -0000 I have repro'd this this morning and am debugging it as I write this, hope to have a fix soon. Jack On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Mark Atkinson wrote: > I updated to current today. 3/5/2008 and I have two em fiber cards with > 82542 chips. Unless I enable promisc on the interface, I don't appear to > receive any traffic. > > This box also has two onboard nfe nics that work fine w/o promisc. > > em0@pci0:18:4:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10008086 chip=0x10008086 > rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82542 Gigabit Ethernet Controller' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > em1@pci0:18:9:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10008086 chip=0x10008086 > rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82542 Gigabit Ethernet Controller' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > -- > Mark Atkinson > atkin901@yahoo.com > (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired); > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >