From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  8 21:45:52 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3361065670
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Dec 2008 21:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dado@cnt.korolev-net.ru)
Received: from cnt.korolev-net.ru (mail.korolev-net.ru [89.222.185.1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3944C8FC1F
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Dec 2008 21:45:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dado@cnt.korolev-net.ru)
Received: by cnt.korolev-net.ru (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id CC3732ABA3F; Tue,  9 Dec 2008 00:20:24 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:20:24 +0300
From: Evgenii Davidov <dado@korolev-net.ru>
To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20081208212024.GD87800@korolev-net.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Subject: kernel nat memory usage?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:45:52 -0000


tell me please:

does kernel nat in ipfw have a memory leak like ng_nat+libalias:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/115526
?
i haven't tested it yet

thank you

-- 
Evgenii V Davidov