From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 4 15:56:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.wa.home.com (ha1.rdc1.wa.home.com [24.0.2.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF9037B6F6 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:56:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from goodleaf@home.com) Received: from C702312-A.sttln1.wa.home.com ([24.14.237.48]) by mail.rdc1.wa.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <20000404225652.XBUF1875.mail.rdc1.wa.home.com@C702312-A.sttln1.wa.home.com> for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:56:52 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) From: John Goodleaf X-Sender: goodleaf@C702312-A.sttln1.wa.home.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Off Topicish--Proprietary sw and SCO emulation Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, My company is considering an implementation of Connect Direct, which is essentially a secure FTP system as far as I can tell. Has anyone out there had experience with this? It runs on SCO's OS, and I was wondering how well it would work on a FreeBSD server emulating SCO 'NIX. (Cost issues.) High performance is not exactly necessary, but stability is. Anyone running critical sw under emulation? It's a long shot I know, but it can't hurt to ask. Thanks, J To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message