From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon May 3 8:58:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F6B15043 for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 08:58:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost (1482 bytes) by rip.psg.com via sendmail with P:stdio/R:inet_resolve/T:smtp (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 08:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1 built 1999-Apr-1) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 08:30:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: FreeBSD Laptoppers Subject: Re: PAO+ep0 slooooow References: <19990503101305.L23827@stat.Duke.EDU> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> using zp0 (sans pao) this host would rdump (to a dlt on a neighboring host) >> in well under an hour >> using ep0 under pao it takes over 14 hours. >> any hints at where i should be looking? > I'd worry about IRQ's. What IRQ is your pccard controller running > on? What does windoze think it should be running on? What about > ep0? > I had a similar problem with ep0 and an HP Omnibook. The pcic_irq > was being set to 3 (even though the hardware wanted to be on 10) and > ep0 just wouldn't work on 10 (due to the pcic listening there). It > was not until I had pcic on 10 and ep0 on 11 that life was happy. pcic0: rev 0x00 int a irq 255 on pci0.10.0 ... pcic0 at 0x3e0-0x3e1 irq 11 on isa PC-Card ctlr(0) Ricoh RL5C475/476 [CardBus bridge mode] (5 mem & 2 I/O windows) pcic0: slot 0 controller I/O address 0x3e0 ... cmd ntpd pid 112 tried to use non-present sched_get_priority_min cmd ntpd pid 112 tried to use non-present sched_setscheduler ep0: utp/bnc[*UTP*] address 00:a0:24:ac:89:33 and ep0 is forced to int 10 by pccard.conf randy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message