From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 00:23:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D6F16A41C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE26543D53 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:23:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DBB7A403; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42B0C679.5020704@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:23:21 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050423 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John McAree References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8062D275E@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <20050613212049.GA6339@netsoc.ucd.ie> <20050614002324.GA32062@netsoc.ucd.ie> <42AF4034.1080300@elischer.org> <42B081EB.9020902@mcaree.org> In-Reply-To: <42B081EB.9020902@mcaree.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Optical Mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:23:22 -0000 John McAree wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> did you guys apply the first patch or the second patch, and, if the >> second, did you also do the >> first line setting h.report_ID to zero? > > > I applied the small patch (hid-race.patch), then attempted to apply > the second (hid.c.patch) to see if it fixed the issues I was having > with the mouse now that it was working. This was failing to apply > after applying the first patch, so I ended up hacking the 2 patches in > together, applying to the original file. There's quite a noticable > improvement in the performance of the mouse for me. > > John. can you send me a diff -u output of your resulting file?