From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 24 13:35:52 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7F437B401; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caddis.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16640; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:34:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by caddis.yogotech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f9OKYB204881; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:34:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15319.9666.980234.895918@caddis.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:34:10 -0600 To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: nate@yogotech.com, des@ofug.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/modules/apm Makefile In-Reply-To: <20011025.040820.59742261.ume@mahoroba.org> References: <15319.1114.52674.966040@caddis.yogotech.com> <20011025.034150.85324385.ume@mahoroba.org> <15319.3134.821325.222080@caddis.yogotech.com> <20011025.040820.59742261.ume@mahoroba.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > nate> The thing is that this only effects apm, so it really belongs to the APM > nate> module. > > I see. > > nate> Also, a patch was proposed a while back to fix this in a manner > nate> that doesn't effect non-broken machines negatively. I don't remember > nate> who proposed it, but the name 'John' stands out in my mind. (It may > nate> have been Jonathen Lemons...) > > I with to see it. I just searched the FreeBSD web. Do you mean > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=406205+413022+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-hackers/20000409.freebsd-hackers ? That looks right, but obviously it's been a long time. I believe an updated patch was posted more recently. > nate> Unfortunately, I was unable to test it since my new laptop no longer has > nate> a problem. > > I may test it here. But, that patch set broken_statclock instead of > statclock_disable when 0x20 is set. After the patch, broken_statclock and statclock_disable are essentially the same thing (functionally). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message