From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  5 22:20:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBED16A402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 May 2006 22:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ciscogeek@bgp4.net)
Received: from isis.bgp4.net (isis.bgp4.net [66.246.197.72])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AAB43D45
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 May 2006 22:20:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ciscogeek@bgp4.net)
Received: from [192.168.23.3] (c-67-171-8-36.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.8.36])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by isis.bgp4.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k45MKFwI017763
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 May 2006 15:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ciscogeek@bgp4.net)
Message-ID: <445BCEE3.6040607@bgp4.net>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:17:07 -0700
From: Janet Sullivan <ciscogeek@bgp4.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com>		<20060503110503.O58458@fledge.watson.org>		<35c231bf0605031821s582b6d03j3ee9d434a596f62a@mail.gmail.com>		<20060504021908.GA714@soaustin.net>		<35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com>		<20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org>		<44598615.3040400@rogers.com>		<20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org>		<44599732.1050905@rogers.com>		<20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl>	<35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com>
	<445B991F.3050600@rogers.com>
In-Reply-To: <445B991F.3050600@rogers.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 22:20:26 -0000

Mike Jakubik wrote:
> arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be 
> released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release to 
> me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the sake 
> of numbering.

For me, and many other quiet users, FreeBSD *IS* stable.  I've been 
running 6.1 since the BETAs with no issues.  No, I don't use quotas.  I 
doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do.

> I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute in a 
> more direct way (always hated those damn pointers), 

You could always hire or help sponsor a developer to fix your pet issues.