From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Oct 30 11:38:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A251537B407 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:38:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from aphrodite.anthonychavez.org (anthonychavez.org [166.70.15.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1760443E77 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from acc@aphrodite.anthonychavez.org) Received: from aphrodite.anthonychavez.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aphrodite.anthonychavez.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9UJcGO2008805; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from acc@aphrodite.anthonychavez.org) Received: (from acc@localhost) by aphrodite.anthonychavez.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9UJcGac008804; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:16 -0700 From: "Anthony C. Chavez" To: "Jeremy C. Reed" Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DoD study Message-ID: <20021030193815.GC8079@anthonychavez.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jeremy C. Reed" , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20021030185817.GA8079@anthonychavez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-PGP-Key: http://www.anthonychavez.org/pubkey.asc Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:15:26AM -0800, "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote: > Which ones? >=20 > I do see that it should have the "Original source can be incorporated into > closed source products" property checked. That one (row P) is what I was referring to in particular, although my interpretation of rows K, L and M is that the GPL relies on K, while the BSD license could imply L and M should the "new user" get the source. Like I said, though, that's ~my~ interpretation of the table. I could be wrong. > Yes. Good advocacy. But I wonder what they are used for. That's another reason why I asked if anyone knew of any more studies. :-) --=20 Anthony Chavez http://www.anthonychavez.org/ mailto:acc@anthonychavez.org jabber:acc@jabber.anthonychavez.org --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wDUnbZTbIaRBRXERAm7LAJ9A8QERqyFZIkiyQmCUCt9RFZ+DtACdFxMD JACGNvVIIpmMbXLnR6L39C4= =63Sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message