From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 21 22:17:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from srv4-bsb.bsb.nutecnet.com.br (argonio.bsb.nutecnet.com.br [200.252.253.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F6715049; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 22:17:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from visi0n@aux-tech.org) Received: from ebola.chinatown.org ([200.252.15.93]) by srv4-bsb.bsb.nutecnet.com.br (8.8.5/SCA-6.6) with ESMTP id FAA26035; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:23:55 -0200 (BRV) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 04:16:10 -0200 (EDT) From: visi0n X-Sender: visi0n@ebola.chinatown.org To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: sk_buff vs mbuf Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is there someone closer to a linux box, tell me if sk_buff is more fast than mbuf. I was reading these codes but I can't figure out the final result. =============================================================================== visi0n AUX Technologies [www.aux-tech.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message