From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 1 23:01:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F59D16A401; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED8543D7C; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:00:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k41N0bEp093278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 May 2006 19:00:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [172.21.130.86] (mx-broadway [38.98.68.18]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k41N0Rra079534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 May 2006 19:00:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:00:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605011604.26507.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200605011739.02920.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <445691FE.6000608@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <445691FE.6000608@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605011900.22011.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1434/Mon May 1 15:51:00 2006 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: Subject: Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 23:01:01 -0000 понед╕лок 01 травень 2006 18:55, Jonathan Noack написав: > Did you miss the previous reply which mentioned using '-B/usr/lib32 > -B/usr/local/lib32' in addition to '-m32'? I did not miss this work-around. But it is not a proper way -- one need not specify -B/usr/lib in the 64-bit case. Nor should one need to specify -B/usr/lib32, when using the -m32 flag. The gcc's multilib.h functionality is just for that. We just aren't using it (although we do for for aout) -- presumably, because there *was* a much bigger fish to fry to enable such compiles... -mi