From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 21 14:51:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles514.castles.com [208.214.165.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C62A154B2 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:49:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01442; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:43:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Warner Losh Cc: Garrett Wollman , Mike Smith , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:51:31 MDT." <199908212051.OAA48584@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:43:59 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > : If you need more functionality than DEVICE_SUSPEND and DEVICE_RESUME, > : then add more methods. > > That DEVICE_SUSPEND and DEVICE_RESUME methods are exactly the same > thing as we have right now with the apm code. No need to reinvent the > wheel here. It was on my list of cleanups to do after I got the > pccard stuff to the point where modems work again. If you're going to do that, take a look at the ACPI spec and implement at least the base set of power states that it defines, since we are going to have to live with hardware that behaves like that for some time to come. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message