From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 25 08:08:28 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FB916A403
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru)
Received: from f48.mail.ru (f48.mail.ru [194.67.57.84])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B57543D46
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru)
Received: from mail by f48.mail.ru with local id 1GcdoI-000MsQ-00
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:26 +0400
Received: from [217.25.25.67] by win.mail.ru with HTTP;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:26 +0400
From: =?koi8-r?Q?=F2=C9=C8=C1=C4_=E7=C1=C4=D6=C9=C5=D7?= <rihad@mail.ru>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
X-Originating-IP: [217.25.25.67]
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:26 +0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1GcdoI-000MsQ-00.rihad-mail-ru@f48.mail.ru>
Subject: tcpwrappers & SSH
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=F2=C9=C8=C1=C4_=E7=C1=C4=D6=C9=C5=D7?= <rihad@mail.ru>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:08:29 -0000

A comment in /etc/hosts.allow states that:
Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea

Why? Is it because such restrictions should naturally be made using a firewall/PAM/sshd itself/whatever? I think GENERIC sshd wouldn't have been built with libwrap support in the first place. Or?