From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 23:21:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C88316A420 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4708A13C467 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102) id E0E1A732FF; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:21:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:21:39 +0000 From: John Birrell To: Andrew Gallatin , current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080202232139.GA97956@what-creek.com> References: <20080201093538.GA83169@what-creek.com> <18339.35979.765504.132672@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20080201223719.GA88460@what-creek.com> <18340.50354.244903.435464@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20080202203319.GA96610@what-creek.com> <20080202230728.GA8594@voi.aagh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080202230728.GA8594@voi.aagh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: DTrace/FreeBSD source snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:21:40 -0000 On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:07:28PM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > Are there no anonymous checkouts from perforce? Anonymous access to perforce isn't possible because perforce maintains client state on the server. That's one of the disadvantages of perforce. > I remember looking a while ago and not finding anything. I also > remember a cvsup server linked to it at some point.. There was, but some hardware problems got in the way of the export and the files weren't kept up-to-date. Since I am so close to committing to current, it isn't worth wasting the project admins' time getting it back up an running when it will be obsolete soon. I decide that I could distribute one big tar and then diffs from that, so although the initial download is huge, keeping the source tree up-to-date should be just a matter of applying a patch or two (or twenty). -- John Birrell