From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 09:57:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617A437B408 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ussenterprise.ufp.org (ussenterprise.ufp.org [208.185.30.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3FC43FA3 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bicknell@ussenterprise.ufp.org) Received: from ussenterprise.ufp.org (bicknell@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ussenterprise.ufp.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6LGvZ8i056811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bicknell@localhost) by ussenterprise.ufp.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6LGvZFx056810; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:57:35 -0400 From: Leo Bicknell To: Tim Kientzle Message-ID: <20030721165735.GA56766@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tim Kientzle , hackers@freebsd.org References: <3F1B0610.90803@acm.org> <20030720225041.GA26277@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <3F1C0C91.6050203@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F1C0C91.6050203@acm.org> Organization: United Federation of Planets X-PGP-Key: http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Correct way to call execve? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:57:43 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message written on Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:53:53AM -0700, Tim Kientzle= wrote: > Actually, this example passes -Wall if you declare > "execargv" as simply "char *[]". However, I'm looking > for something that passes gcc -Wwrite-strings, which this > example does not. % cat exec.c #include #include int main(int argc, char *const argv[], char *const envp[]) { char *execargv[2]; execargv[0] =3D (char *)_PATH_BSHELL; execargv[1] =3D (char *)NULL; execve(_PATH_BSHELL,execargv,envp); return 0; } % cc -Wwrite-strings exec.c % cc -Wall exec.c Looks good to me. --=20 Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE/HBt/Nh6mMG5yMTYRAireAKCGpkL4F+HaO2EtLIf0SkvxE+dINACVFkIC CAF2RcO7TZpZJAmjuExIGQ== =ymiB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--