From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 21 14:56:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2339C14BE2 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:56:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA62856; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA49041; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908212155.PAA49041@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away Cc: Garrett Wollman , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:43:59 PDT." <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:23 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : If you're going to do that, take a look at the ACPI spec and implement : at least the base set of power states that it defines, since we are : going to have to live with hardware that behaves like that for some : time to come. Good idea... However, most ACPI machines have a legacy APM model, which is what the device methods support. When the ACPI stuff comes it, it will likely need to expand the methods... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message