From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 14 19:11:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4849335 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from eu1sys200aog101.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog101.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EB7E1B for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f197.google.com ([209.85.212.197]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob101.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUWr/X/qUDt/cQ/fb047qdC5KkqjOk7bR@postini.com; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:11:54 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f197.google.com with SMTP id hn17so1697101wib.0 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:sender:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc :reply-to:in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=gP3s534UcnNLFCAU1rw7n2xAY+Xzw4+Jr3rxUJJMpjw=; b=XsBLd/PizQmf9JW2sXg6RPabsRtubrWox1ldLjr8B58QpO68T0IlK6HWYrZZw0MI5A ASAA1X9LIwzbTk52v+NegtOH204YbpDpOb4sJBrnE3nUbbKgKLZV6XTZno+lBeuL8s8A MA5O1hQnK4Cwo+vNKFGBRQS9Rfkxj/YL5Wa1fQ2fEGROhja7vWfB5kYSc0MEI/1noOO+ QozQxcZmC/mrgu5C9c/e7F24vgooyqMpRLlDYzID2drWFbASSDPFXYCWPbqrFEBQ5WoB 3mTslMm0d35qa/nh+AHr6x6r/a957t1nmTEGTecCdQ3UJn8RFubVe4ZYpEho2NfEwdSs 80Pw== X-Received: by 10.180.109.197 with SMTP id hu5mr7844910wib.22.1365966687152; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.109.197 with SMTP id hu5mr7844897wib.22.1365966686983; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bo1sm10645332wib.0.2013.04.14.12.11.24 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Anton Shterenlikht Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3EJBMkr084883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:11:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r3EJBMOb084882; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:11:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:11:22 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201304141911.r3EJBMOb084882@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: rpaulo@FreeBSD.org, scottl@samsco.org Subject: Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer In-Reply-To: <2D0B66DB-E232-4F34-9D01-57DF226B9BAA@FreeBSD.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJr+1uO035z0W/ZXfWLHzOiQ4KE2tppC6A1T66jLnlWuy81PLWYMfnha4vfa3b7cSu5M9euYfU5IZLDgHKWL/k8fWwcFhc9bNmAQUBl5e+u2t6tUfiEOEf0amWtNh38EGgPDZ12mmkOUUvq66nKufLDbwoVw== Cc: glebius@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:11:55 -0000 A migration *guide*, yes. Tools to convert one syntax to another: no. ok, so what is the brief migraiton advice? The Handbook mentions PF and IPFW. I gather from your mails that PF is the recommended choice. Is that so? If I choose PF, can I just follow the Handbook PF section, and once it's working, remove all IPF related kernel options and config files? Thanks Anton