From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 11 19:03:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA27018 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA27007 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id TAA23536; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:02:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701120302.TAA23536@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Charles Henrich cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-BETA(2?) on ftp.cdrom.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 1997 21:35:54 EST." <199701090235.VAA04925@crh.cl.msu.edu> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:02:01 -0800 Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Might I suggest that before we roll a 2.2-RELEASE it first runs on >ftp.cdrom.com for a few weeks? If there is any system that can verify an OS, >its cdrom.com! Other's have already adequately answered this, but I thought perhaps I'd add that I do plan on switching to 2.2-stable after 2.2R has been out for awhile (a month or two)...assuming that no significant bugs are found, of course. Right now, things aren't looking very good for this prospect, however. In any case, I'm not in any hurry and I'm certainly not willing to run pre-release code on the machine. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project