From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 16:08:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2949D106564A for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erdgeist@erdgeist.org) Received: from elektropost.org (elektropost.org [217.13.206.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F6E8FC1C for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25010 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 15:42:06 -0000 Received: from elektropost.org (HELO elektropost.org) (erdgeist@erdgeist.org) by elektropost.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jan 2011 15:42:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:42:05 +0100 (CET) From: Dirk Engling To: Paul Schenkeveld In-Reply-To: <20110127120447.GA40060@psconsult.nl> Message-ID: References: <20110127120447.GA40060@psconsult.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d/jail issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:08:49 -0000 On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > like to start A before B but shutdown B before A. Would it make sense > to reverse the order in which jails are stopped during shutdown by > reversing the nales in $jail_list? Yikes, it does indeed make sense, that's why I already do it in the ezjail utility, besides having jail dependencies worked out by rcorder... Now, if /etc/rc.d/jail starts to reverse the list ezjail reverses before, I'm in trouble. Maybe it's time to think about moving some more jail abstraction - including jail dependencies - to the base system. erdgeist