From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Apr 5 14: 3: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227E37B970; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:02:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA97831; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:02:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA84111; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:01:42 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200004052101.PAA84111@harmony.village.org> To: Coleman Kane Subject: Re: How stable is the ATA code? Cc: John Baldwin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, lioux@uol.com.br In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:01:46 EDT." <20000405150146.B6856@evil.2y.net> References: <20000405150146.B6856@evil.2y.net> <200004051730.NAA02597@server.baldwin.cx> <200004051742.LAA80005@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:01:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000405150146.B6856@evil.2y.net> Coleman Kane writes: : The original point was that the troubles weren't necessarily : chipset-specific or mobo specific. There is probably some code that : needs to be dealt with. I got the impression that it was this particular 82C586B plus some marginal IDE drives. I've not seen other chipsets mentioned as often. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message