From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 08:20:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F392137B401 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D2F43FEA for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h61FKIUp052865 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h61FKI0S052864; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200307011520.h61FKI0S052864@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: KATO Tsuguru Subject: Re: ports/53582: Update port: graphics/gd to 2.0.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: KATO Tsuguru List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:20:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/53582; it has been noted by GNATS. From: KATO Tsuguru To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: daichi , Alex Dupre Subject: Re: ports/53582: Update port: graphics/gd to 2.0.15 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:11:54 +0900 On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 23:32:03 +0900 daichi wrote: > > Why have you updated gd from 1.8.4 to 2.0.15 and not gd2 from 2.0.12 > > to 2.0.15? I think graphics/gd should remain to 1.8.4 release. > > Oh yes. So now I think you are right. > I will work tommorow. Sorry. Well, I guess the only reason gd-1.8.x port is remaind in ports tree is gd-2.0.x was unstable developmental version. At now. gd-2.0.15 is announced as stable release, graphics/gd2 port should be retired immidiately and every ports depending on it have to switch dependency to graphics/gd. In addition, most ports actually require gd-1.8.x (or older) code have already been containing it as internal library. Furthermore, gd-1.8.x port and gd-2.0.x was not be able to co-exist safely. If there is still any paticular reason to remain gd-1.8.x port, we'll have to modify its library name etc.