From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 7 18:02:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372FF1065672 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E688FC18 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 18:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so4676980bwz.13 for ; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=V9H8j44y20hWQ+ihK7wgqqYAfRLsp1vkm6ICIcwvsjo=; b=nT2xg+CCRxREmglzYedz/wqV1sBAK/aWth8y1VZVAsXEyFF6HIRSiVYdVGpVWxXMAN U/dtDgYyybENeWFMR5xyAM4D6IG9MNCnpNZUMbQgi5qS7i7FqttgN6Dngb8SpfZ+AeED vVYqKParIGsHQXwEZNKmZuOd3fyyzwEf0AGo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=SLD9X8AhEmPkxwHFEvF91Cu2gpZJDpLND0o8zBq1/fCEESdLB4qoSGHf65EsBnms9g Dn7hOGZJ22Dh8tOkNrMqbRspkB6bl207l3fr8BJVX57EtlZKe9FlmO9mb2VRYpd1IhID 8JASw8OMRuSauruOUaRfjLugUEdyQTBo07pzQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.145.18 with SMTP id b18mr2214102bkv.26.1304791363332; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.3.217 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC5737A.8000602@forethought.net> References: <723BE905-95AC-4B07-AD31-3D149F06527E@lafn.org> <462351.71539.qm@web36505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <507118.67900.qm@web36504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4DC5737A.8000602@forethought.net> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 13:02:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Reed Loefgren Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sending a Fax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 18:02:45 -0000 > I'd like to add to this that, in my opinion, the real issue these days is > the emailing of unencrypted business papers. I take the position that > *nothing* is ever deleted from an email server these days; or from those > servers that are just relaying, no matter what the RFC says. I shake my head > at what people send to their correspondents, that they would never think of > discussing with a stranger. And yet they do just that via the spool. > I second your opinion. Now that recording conversations & emails between people, they save everything for later coming back with lawsuits/blackmail/etc. There are many examples but one that comes to mind is the Brett Favre scandal with then Jet's reporter Jen Sterger. That was a text, and *it apparently was saved since 2008* and it became a scandal, this of course last year and now the *LOCKOUT * :( These people make too much money already and they want more :( Sorry for drifting out of topic. An example where paperless documents are preffered, take a look at IRS they will require users to file electronically starting next year. They want to save paper and this is a government agency. Schools are implementing this too, they want to send messages to their teachers/workers/staff because ultiimately saving the environment is more important (too many dead trees) Regards, Antonio