From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 21 08:12:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F0D106566C for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2409B8FC0C for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [88.130.201.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2B68A1633; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:12:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B80EAD4.1070109@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:12:04 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Solskogen References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package-noinstall does not include rc.d scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:12:19 -0000 On 20/02/2010 16:55, Christer Solskogen wrote: > Hi! > > I've just discovered the make option "make package-noinstall" which > makes a tbz in /usr/ports/packages from a already installed package. > But I've also found a bug(?) with that option. The package it creates > seems not to include rc.d script which will be included if you use > "make package" > I've tried this now with two ports (stunnel and mysql51-server) - but > I guess that it will happen to other ports as well. Does the same problem appear with "pkg_create -b"? I'd expect such a target simply calling that and if that would be broken it would affect the use of almost every package maintenance tool for the FreeBSD ports. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?