From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 16:27:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E75416A402 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2F013C467 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so478075uge for ; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:27:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p/VRFyqYXuj5AmhmCNGf5IV4ly5qbNZWV5lp2UYDgybOjA4eLjvfx2bRMrYfj4pZngP9jvkxeegGJ2C96AGX2WMzXTSN0Y9IBfh7oqTu7pAZpDfaEqP9o9rMi/J//msYkcplfqP1E69j7BvFHqDNxhcptkRqYPlBEWw0PCuAxno= Received: by 10.78.205.7 with SMTP id c7mr4220097hug.1170952057238; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:27:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 08:27:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:27:37 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: Fluffles In-Reply-To: <45CB391F.6070903@fluffles.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1170861895.87827.8.camel@localhost> <45CA1107.1020609@fluffles.net> <45CB2DE8.1090609@fluffles.net> <45CB391F.6070903@fluffles.net> Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, rsh Subject: Re: External HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:27:42 -0000 On 2/8/07, Fluffles wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > Hmm, Samsung 3,5" drives are rather cheap these days, > > look like a bargain to me. I remember they were regarded > > as a bit slow, but stable some years ago, wonder if that > > is still true... > > The Samsung T166 500GB drive not only has the highest GB-per-euro/dollar > ratio but is also the fastest drive in terms of Sequential Transfer Rate > (STR); beating even the WD Raptor; though i have to say random I/O > performance is much more important than STR. What I'm worried the most about is reliability. I would settle for 10Mb/sec performance if I had a guarantee it would work 24x7x365 for 10 years straight...