From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 21:09:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCEE8BB6 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E6D16DD for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDi9C-1Wf2jo2SSM-00H8Ib; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <536166C9.5080107@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:10:33 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sahil Tandon Subject: Re: A child Postfix port with TLS enabled by default References: <20140330192011.GA92763@jubz> <533876D8.8020505@gmx.de> <20140330215228.GB93840@jubz> <20140429012147.GA71794@jubz> In-Reply-To: <20140429012147.GA71794@jubz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:SimA/D0eA4lEnpsK/mSm7/7dDyD+uxzrFy3cbFU000I95v5AnhB lHJ3FSyijMMBiA4+CShgeLUrpsdlLfLeXYEBH2j+phEkxHlFx1ruLpXsVub+3G7egF/0bXk 0giScJnHL5ENNoE3PeXgxa5n1mtZ8sPigIidNeM/C7zUQEBCVz0TEThASyxxNA+0Z7dZcBl 2tY3VxzV8UeuOUbo4R7GQ== Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:09:29 -0000 On 2014-04-29 03:21, Sahil Tandon wrote: > Thanks to Olli and Matthias, I amended the original patch; revised > version attached. > > PS: I could not think of a less hack-ish way to accomplish the warning > suppression aside from adding those flags to CCARGS. > Hi Sahil, I have some addition. mail/postfix port - CONFLICTS_INSTALL?= ... misses postfix-tls else your patch looks good to me :) -- Regards, olli