From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 19 14:25:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6B237BC1A; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 14:25:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA92457; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:26:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:26:00 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon Message-Id: <200002192226.QAA92457@prism.flugsvamp.com> To: dcs@newsguy.com, freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: feedback on CD install of 4.0-RC2 X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-current In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article you write: >Kai Großjohann wrote: >> >> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> >> > I really kinda wish you'd point them to Novice^H^H^H^H^HStandard >> > instead since it does more than be a bit more verbose, it also makes >> > sure that all the appropriate steps are covered and prevents even >> > relatively skilled people from hanging themselves. >> >> Does this mean that this option should be called `guided'? I know a >> little bit about Unix but haven't installed FreeBSD more than five >> times or so. And I always thought that the novice install meant that >> I didn't get as many choices... > >"Guided". I like it. That's *PRECISELY* what this installation option >is. There is NO difference in the number of choices available in any of >the three types. > >Guided/Express/Expert. That's my vote. Cool, seconded. I actually use "novice" most of the time, simply because I like the hints that help me not to screw up, and I've been using this option (or equivalent) since 1.1.5 at least. Guided sounds like a better description to me. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message