From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 07:42:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427B716A407; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0183B13C489; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:42:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB3C2091; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:42:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140AC2090; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D7522A10AC; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:42:20 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <200704090219.l392Jc1f064727@repoman.freebsd.org> <864pnpdf8w.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070410010901.GD61460@wantadilla.lemis.com> <86zm5gr9wl.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070410071256.GJ91694@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:42:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070410071256.GJ91694@wantadilla.lemis.com> (Greg Lehey's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:42:56 +0930") Message-ID: <86r6qsr7z7.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/touch touch.1 touch.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:42:26 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > On Tuesday, 10 April 2007 at 9:00:42 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > > usage() should be the way it was before your commit, except that it > > should be static. > You mean declared as a static function? In a program of a single > file? Fine, so never mind static if you don't like it. There is still no reason for it to use argv[0]. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no