From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 22:04:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 2FE3B16A41B; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:04:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20071116220448.GA20435@FreeBSD.org> References: <200711161314.lAGDERAd027540@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711161314.lAGDERAd027540@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:04:49 -0000 On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:14:27PM +0000, Ken Smith wrote: > kensmith 2007-11-16 13:14:27 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > release Makefile > Log: > The i386 disc1 size wandered above what fits on 650Mb media which has been > our target previously. So i386 joins the others that have switched over > to a separate livefs iso image. I'm not even sure 650M discs are still being produced. Seriously, I know that this was raised before, and the answer was always "no", but aren't we loosing more that gaining by sticking with 650M limit? ./danfe