From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 15:28:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9647B16A4E0 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3D343D53 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E495887C; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:28:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (c-68-58-232-106.hsd1.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA97990768; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:28:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GEpEJ-0001j3-00; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:28:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:28:51 -0400 From: stan To: Simon Phoenix Message-ID: <20060820152851.GA6233@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Phoenix , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060820143620.GA5079@teddy.fas.com> <200608201757.36094.phoenix.lists@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608201757.36094.phoenix.lists@gmail.com> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 11:12:53 up 125 days, 12:19, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: etheeal port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:28:53 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:57:28PM +0300, Simon Phoenix wrote: > On Sunday 20 August 2006 17:36, stan wrote: > > I'm building a replacement machine for my workstation at work this weeked > > (6 STABLE). The ethereal port seesm to be missing from the ports tree. > > > > This packages is a "must have" app for me. > > > > Cany anyone enlighten me as to what has ahppened here, since the > > last time I built a machine? > > Ethereal is a Wireshark now. > http://www.wireshark.org/ > /usr/ports/net/wireshark Thanks, looks like I missed the News Forge article on this. Seems to be a bit more to this than has been publicly disclosed though... -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)