From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 13 1:50: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06A37B40B for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f8D8o1f21675; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109130850.f8D8o1f21675@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: ports/30394: Maintainer update: sysutils/fileutils (4.1) Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/30394; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/30394: Maintainer update: sysutils/fileutils (4.1) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Akinori MUSHA wrote: > At Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:00:02 -0700 (PDT), > Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > in attachment, you'll find the original patch set w/ a reduced diff. > > IMHO, @dirrm should not complain on non empty directories and using > > @unexec rmdir 2> /dev/null || : is something we shouldn't use. > > Yeah.. and we have another mess here. Because of a checksum problem > with symlinks, we have to put each symlink prior to the file it points > to, in a pkg-list. > > I'll swap the sequence of each pair of LC_MESSAGES/fileutils.mo and > LC_TIME, and then commit. don't know about that ! next time, I'll use "@exec ln -s" as usually I do... now, I know why I always do that ;^) thanks anyway. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message