From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 13 14:17:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from hades.riverstyx.net (hades.riverstyx.net [216.94.42.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3707515117; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:17:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unknown@riverstyx.net) Received: from localhost (unknown@localhost) by hades.riverstyx.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01888; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:14:51 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:14:51 -0700 (PDT) From: To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? In-Reply-To: <58590.923989789@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Why fight Linux anyway? I'd say NT is a bigger threat. After all, you're trying to get this thru to IT managers at big corporations and the like. They're not comparing the Unices, they're looking at it from a "NT or... what?" kinda viewpoint. --- tani hosokawa river styx internet On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD over Linux for increased reliability" > > Or, even less combatatively: > > "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD for overall reliability" > > Then in the article you can have a paragraph saying how Linux was > evaluated and FreeBSD chosen instead, even though the renderman binary > was a Linux one. Even if it just states reasons of personal > preference for this, it's fine. Just so long as it's not in the > headline or makes claims that Linux is somehow less reliable in > general (stating a preference is not the same as making bold claims), > we're fine. > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message