From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 12 10:58:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [12.9.219.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D62915254 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from HARLIE.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [12.9.219.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24290; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:58:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:58:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: Christopher Michaels , "'Mike Squires'" , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Setting Intel Pro100B to half duplex In-Reply-To: <199910121742.AA193980161@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > Can you (or anyone) state with any degree of certainty that any modern > equipment built with NWAY autonegotiation exhibits any problems with > autonegotiation? I've got a switch that does NWAY autonegotiation that has serious problems talking to anything that doesn't do NWAY autonegotiation, if that counts. Also had some D-Link cards that when I plugged two of them together, one end went full duplex, one went half duplex (but these cards had other problems as well). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message