From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  1 21:21:49 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F516A4DA
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 21:21:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com)
Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC18B43D55
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2006 21:21:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com)
Received: (from dan@localhost)
	by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k71LLi6h021210;
	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:21:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:21:44 -0500
From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Message-ID: <20060801212144.GH63872@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <20060801150226.0c911297.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
	<000401c6b59e$92d942d0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645>
	<20060801152107.eba203fa.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060801152107.eba203fa.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE
X-message-flag: Outlook Error
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Reducing the timeout on a TCP connection
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:21:49 -0000

In the last episode (Aug 01), Bill Moran said:
> In response to "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>:
> > This is why the snmp protocol uses UDP, Bill.
> > 
> > You need to use something other than TCP for
> > monitoring.
> 
> Well ... if I'm monitoring a server that uses TCP (PostgreSQL) I
> can't rightly establish whether or not it's successfully accepting
> connections unless I used TCP as well.

What I do is ping the target server first, with a small (1s) timeout.
If the ping fails, I don't try the TCP socket.  If the ping succeeds, I
know the TCP connection will either complete or fail immediately.

Another option is to do non-blocking connects to as many servers as you
have fds available, and select()/poll()/kqueue() for the results.  that
way at least you're checking other machines while waiting for the few
dead ones.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com