From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 13:43:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90C316A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:43:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: from aposerv.p-i-n.com (aposerv.p-i-n.com [145.253.185.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337843D49 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:43:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: from p-i-n.com (inside.p-i-n.com [129.10.9.21]) by aposerv.p-i-n.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58DhIlB008607; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:43:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: (from rabe@localhost) by p-i-n.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j58DhCO67297; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:43:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rabe) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:43:12 +0200 From: "Raphael H. Becker" To: ticso@cicely.de Message-ID: <20050608154312.D41471@p-i-n.com> References: <20050608122324.C41471@p-i-n.com> <42A6D850.2070603@centtech.com> <20050608123953.GG95969@cicely12.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20050608123953.GG95969@cicely12.cicely.de>; from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:39:53PM +0200 Organization: PHOENIX Pharmahandel AG & Co KG, Mannheim, Deutschland Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Eric Anderson Subject: Re: Accessing SCSI-Devices >2TB X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:43:32 -0000 On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:39:53PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:36:48AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > > Raphael H. Becker wrote: > > >The support for this RAID told me just SuSE Linux and W2k3/64Bit Systems > > >are able to access devices >2TB (64bit LBA) therefore the larger RAIDs > > >are preconfigured with smaller partitions. > > > > That is correct - only a few OS's that I know of currently support 64bit > > LBA. I wanted the same thing (except I would like 18TB), and I didn't > > find anyone working on this. Maybe that has changed though. > > Because there is nothing to do about this since years. > > revision 1.139 > date: 2003/04/30 00:35:22; author: ken; state: Exp; lines: +194 -65 > Add support to CAM for devices with more than 2^32 blocks. (2TB if you're > using 512 byte blocks). So, what will i have to do to get lets say 1kb blocks? Raphael Becker