From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 8 02:53:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3860716A4DE for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from howard0su@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCC543D4C for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:53:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howard0su@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so215135nzn for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:53:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BD7FL+iQvQ/fmWWsjANvTFv9PW9v6rCdeLJMhUdf/CDoSiHW7hIBVNgGC0C8Z3FiS8curT8PhkqdRO5hjb+34UHSivfv+6ptidcx3WYcvj1gTigV8sLOWWuCP8+r1v1wknYNRaujag6bo/AVdqDItwG01kC7vKyeouF46My96K4= Received: by 10.35.40.10 with SMTP id s10mr1877017pyj; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.44.12 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:53:35 +0800 From: "Howard Su" To: "gnn@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modularize kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 02:53:37 -0000 On 9/7/06, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > At Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:47:46 +0800, > Hello Howard, > > The monolithic vs. modularized kernel is an old discussion. If you're > really interested in pursuing this you'll have a lot of work to do, > mostly in figuring out explicitly all the implicit inter-module > dependencies. Fascinating and fun, but you likely need a good reason > to do it. I listed the advantages I can think about. Can they convince you? -- -Howard