From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 08:59:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E0716A41F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:59:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from mail.pipni.cz (mail.pipni.cz [193.86.238.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA4343D60 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martinkov@pobox.sk) Received: from [193.86.238.3] (port=44222 helo=gamato.org) id 1EjCBn-0006Uv-GL; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:59:15 +0100 From: "martinko" To: delphij@delphij.net Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:59:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20051205085825.M13618@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 165.72.200.9 (m@gamato.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a file version number going down after upgrade from 6.0-R to 6.0-S X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:59:24 -0000 On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:37:05 +0800, Xin LI wrote > Hi, > > On 12/5/05, martinko wrote: > > hello, > > > > i noticed, when upgrading from 6.0-R to 6-stable, that > > /etc/rc.d/wpa_supplicant version went down. > > until now i had believed that stable branch contains newer software than > > the release. if so, why this "downgrade" ?? > > 1.1.4.1 stands for "first revision of the 4th branch" on 1.1, and > 1.1.2.1 stands for "first revision of the 2nd branch". The former is > created after the latter. It's not a downgrade as RELENG_6_0 is > created after RELENG_6 (hence 4 vs 2), and everything merged to > RELENG_6_0 must be part of RELENG_6 before it happen. > > Cheers, > -- > Xin LI http://www.delphij.net I see now. Many thanks for your explanation, Xin! Martin