From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 01:49:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0639E16A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viharnik.xenya.net (viharnik.xenya.si [213.143.80.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE0F43D39 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:49:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cuk@cuk.nu) Received: from localhost (tabla.xenya.si [213.143.80.70]) by viharnik.xenya.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981632357E for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:49:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from viharnik.xenya.net ([213.143.80.85]) by localhost (tabla.xenya.si [213.143.80.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81510-10 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:49:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.6.60] (unknown [192.168.6.60]) by viharnik.xenya.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D127E23564 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:49:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <419EA38B.4000907@cuk.nu> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:53:15 +0100 From: Marko Cuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at xenya.si Subject: pf multipath nat X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:49:51 -0000 I have a question regarding this... What happen, if one of the uplinks goes down ? What does pf knows about states of interfaces and availiability ? I'd like to know also, how to configure FreeBSD, to send out packet with proper source IP and what is the default route in that case ? Can anyone speak a little about that ? Tnx, Marko Cuk On Tuesday 16 November 2004 13:08, Łukasz Dudek wrote: >/ Dnia Wto, Lis 09, 2004 o godzinie 02:13:34 +0100, Łukasz Dudek napisał(a): />/ > Dnia Pon, Lis 08, 2004 o godzinie 04:21:39 +0100, Max Laier napisał(a): />/ > > On Monday 08 November 2004 15:30, Łukasz Dudek wrote: />/ > > > i've tried to configure multipath nat using RELENG_5 box />/ > > > (when it was current and now when it became stable) />/ />/ this is full ruleset / Okay sorry for the delay, but I was (and in fact still am) very busy with real life these days. Will hopefully resume to full working speed soon. Nontheless, I finally found some time to rig a test-setup for this ruleset with two Soekris boxes. Unfortunately I wasn't able to see any problem. No hang, no stalling, nothing! Can you please try to get more information about the problem in your setup? I need to know what kind of "hang" it is. Deadlock, lifelock, etc? Try to break into the debugger via serial console or Crtl + ALt + Esc etc. I cannot reproduce it, sorry. Does anybody successfully run more than one uplink in this way? What hardware do you have? Same question to Łukasz, what kind of box is this? Are we looking at an SMP box? >/ can i provide any more information or is there anything anything i can />/ do to help resolv this issue, have anyone been able to reproduce this />/ behaviour, i would really like to utilize second link using freebsd box />/ moving every service from free to open will be performance lost and />/ services, network downtime. this box without configuring second link />/ is 100% stable / I really need some definite description of the problem. "It seems to hang" is way too imprecise, sorry.