From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 28 19:59:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF8D16A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0630343D46 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:59:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 15337 invoked by uid 555); 29 Apr 2004 06:59:29 +0400 Received: from shark (213.80.149.190) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1083207568-15325 for cpressey@catseye.mine.nu; Thu, 29 Apr 06:59:28 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D86F1DD; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:59:24 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:59:23 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Chris Pressey Message-ID: <20040429025923.GA2015@Shark.localdomain> References: <20040425215837.3f4708fe.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <20040426094335.GA7578@online.fr> <20040426115842.GA4144@Shark.localdomain> <20040427160737.GA1325@Shark.localdomain> <20040428023920.GA382@Shark.localdomain> <20040428163104.GA10537@Shark.localdomain> <20040428101138.38e25081.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040428101138.38e25081.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:59:31 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Chris Pressey probably wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:31:04 +0400 > Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > >=20 > > If I take out every word about main() from C's specification (making > > it an ordinary function), will the resulting `language' stay > > Turing-complete? >=20 > Not AFAIK. >=20 > > If not, why? >=20 > You no longer have a start state. >=20 What if I add `The function with the same name as the executable starts the program's execution like main() does in C'? --=20 DoubleF Decision maker, n.: The person in your office who was unable to form a task force before the music stopped. --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAkG+Lwo7hT/9lVdwRAvTQAJ0f6cSKEIkPLrJnwJnlUtVQx7O6/wCcDhG5 q0DpeZUjUNfAVbHvUbbUie0= =Xl9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--